Crucial BX500 1TB 3D NAND SATA 2.5 Inch Internal SSD - Up to 540MB/s - CT1000BX500SSD1

Product Information

Wie üblich verzichte ich darauf, die ganzen technischen Daten aufzulisten, da man diese ja in der Artikelbeschreibung findet.

The BX500 also did moderately well in the tougher 4K test, where it produced a read speed of 248MB/s and a write speed of 221MB/s. While these results aren’t as high, relatively speaking, as those of the standard sequential test, they’re still pleasantly close to mid-range territory. Somewhat more concerning, at least if you’re a heavy PC user, is the BX500’s relatively low durability. The 240GB model, for example, is rated at 80TBW, meaning you can expect to write 80TB of data to the drive before it starts developing problems.The lasts flash memory technology is 3D NAND, which both the Crucial MX500 and the Crucial BX500 have. 3D NAND requires less power, so your computer runs at a cooler temperature. It is also much faster than the traditional NAND and is superior for the transfer of larger files. Compatibility It was very simple to fit as well. Plugged the SATA cable into the drive and the motherboard and found a spare power plug coming from the power supply that fitted as well and then it was time to test things out. Today, we are going to compare two solid-state drives (SSDs), the Crucial MX500 vs BX500. We will look at capacity, compatibility, and speeds. For a complete overview, we will add a comparison chart and some pros and cons of each. You can install the Crucial MX500 and the Crucial BX500 in any Windows, Mac, or Linux PC or laptop that has a 2.5-inch hard drive bay. Software

You will be able to enjoy transfer speeds of up to 6 GB per second thanks to the SATA 6.0 GB/s hardware interface that comes with the Crucial MX500 and the Crucial BX500. Flash Memory Type All that said, if you are going to buy a budget SATA SSD, relatively recent models like the Crucial BX500 might not logically appeal. Surely, as the SATA platform’s throughput limit means new drives won’t necessarily be faster than old ones, it makes more sense to get a higher-end but older model that’s dropped in price? I decided to go for Crucial as I have always had good experience with them. My PC ram is Crucial and so is the M.2 SSD in my PS5. I felt this had the specs that suited me and as I say, price wise, it was pretty damn cheap. Sadly due to my board being slightly older and being a micro ATX I don't have an M.2 slot, so SATA was the only way to go.The small files test is the only portion the BX500 struggled with, its read and write speeds dropping to 257MB/s and 301MB/s respectively. Unlike in the huge and large files tests, the old MX300 is actually faster here, scoring a 338MB/s read speed and an excellent 519MB/s write speed. The Crucial MX500 and the Crucial BX500 are suitable for computers and laptops that have a 2.5-inch hard drive bay. The Crucial MX500 has the advantage of also coming in an M.2 2880 form factor. Hardware Interface

Die SSD Platte bietet eine preiswerte Möglichkeit auch ältere Notebooks deutlich zu beschleunigen. Für Spieler, die aufwändige 3D Spiele auf dem Computer spielen wollen, ist sie weniger geeignet, da sie mit den M2 Laufwerken bei Weitem nicht vom Tempo her mithalten kann. Das Gleiche gilt auch für Video- oder Bildbearbeitung im Profi Bereich. Hier ist das Laufwerk einfach zu langsam, vermutlich weil zu wenig und zu langsamer Cache Speicher verwendet wurde. Für den Anwender, der ein mehrere Jahre altes Notebook hat, um damit überwiegend Office Arbeiten zu erledigen, oder Youtube Videos zu schauen und im Internet zu surfen oder zu shoppen, ist es eine sehr, sehr preisgünstige Möglichkeit das alte Notebook weiterhin gut und deutlich schneller nutzen zu können.

From the Manufacturer

This change of mind return policy is in addition to, and does not affect your rights under the Australian Consumer Law including any rights you may have in respect of faulty items. Oh, and I kept the old HDD in the rig but formatted it to use just as storage for my music which I have already reinstalled. For a more true-to-life test, we also ran our own file transfer benchmarks using DiskBench. Starting with the huge files test, the BX500 managed a middling read speed of 441MB/s, but its write speed of 496MB/s was another very encouraging showing. Likewise, its read speed result in the large files test – 428MB/s – is extremely competitive by SATA standards.