Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming

Product Information

My guess, therefore, is readers can either remain "frogs" by simply intensifying modalities that are losing efficiency and relevance or learn to vary their behaviours in helping their clients become better people and become "princes".

The idea of content-free therapy is interesting and provocative, and I do hope it's been examined in greater detail elsewhere. By studying people who are unusually talented, you can determine the structure of that talent and then teach it to others as a foundation. Most parts of the book are difficult to understand because of the terminology used so a lot of “newbie” communicators will struggle to get the most out of the book. One of the things that I think distinguishes a really exquisite communicator from one who is not, is to be precise about your use of language: use language in a way that gets you what you want.One of the first books I read post-diagnosis bipolar and the first book that opened a door way to a world of healing and recovery. The degree of polymerization of O-antigen from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is controlled by the products of the wzzs t and wzzfepE genes.

Matching a person’s representational system is an effective, underused technique to migitate conflict. Couples get into trouble because the response they want from the other is different from the one they actually get. If you pay attention to the process words someone uses (verbs, adverbs and adjectives), you can match them to gain rapport.

in a few sessions, (4) make changes in the interactions of couples, families and organizations so that they function in ways that are more satisfying and productive, (5) cure many physical problems - not only most of those recognized as "psychosomatic" but also some that are not - in a few sessions. That's a comment about not being creative enough in the application of it, and not having enough sensory experience to accept all the cues that are there [emphasis mine]. Most major newspapers, TV Networks and Radio Stations around the world have interviewed him over the past 30+ years. The other is to not 'believe in it': "If there's a part of you that really doesn't believe that phobias can be done in three minutes, but you decide to try it anyway, that incongruence will show up in your non-verbal communication, and that will blow the whole thing" (178) The implication, of course, is that if NLP isn’t working, you're either not doing it right, or you simply 'don't believe. I bought it for my husband, who already knows about NLP, and he rated it as one of the best books he owns.

As stated in the preface, this might have been compelling in the original context, but here, even if instructive, it's rather unconvincing. I am probably a little partial because I truly appreciate the author of this book and what he had done on so many levels. I'm not saying NLP is bollocks, and I think this book is a brilliant start up if you want to get into it, it just looks really weak if compared to any scientific finding. Indeed, the primary criticism of IFS is that there is no empirical evidence to back it up - a concern that, it seems to me, is strikingly applicable here. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average.In other words, you need a good unconscious systematic repertoire of patterns for each choice point that you have that's going to come up repetitively in your work: How do I establish rapport with this other human being?