Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
A section that really resonated with me was his exploration of the potential impact of AI on our day-to-day lives. Gawdat does a solid job of extrapolating current trends and imagining the world a few decades down the line. It’s a vision that’s both exciting and cautionary, filled with opportunities and pitfalls. Meet Mo Gawdat, the AI expert who wants you to chill out". British GQ (Conde Nast). 26 June 2023 . Retrieved 1 October 2023. Then again, the style of ‘Scary Smart’ is self-consciously informal because, as Gawdat tells us in the passage detailing the evolution of human intelligence, “spoken and written language in words and maths” is a “killer app.”
Mo Gawdat - Wikipedia Mo Gawdat - Wikipedia
It’s also worth remembering that his ‘be more discerning’ solution aimed at adults, is at least in line with a POSSIBLE reality of people his age who Remember a life without phones AND INTERNET. Asking the upcoming generation to have those traits is chocolate teapot time.Scary Smart explores the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) to upend (and perhaps even end) life as we know it.
Book review: ‘Scary Smart’ by Mo Gawdat | E+T Magazine
Mo Gawdat is the former chief business officer for Google X and has built a monumental career in the tech industry working with the biggest names to reshape and reimagine the world as we know it. From IBM to Microsoft, Mo has lived at the cutting edge of technology and has taken a strong stance that AI is a bigger threat to humanity than global warming. AI is coming. We can’t prevent it but we can make sure it is put on the right path in its infancy. We should start a movement, but not one that attempts to ban it [. . .] nor tries to control it [. . .]. Instead, we can support those who create AI for good and expose the negative impacts of those who task AI to do any form of evil. Register our support for good and our disagreement with evil so widely that the smart ones (by smart ones I mean, of course, the machines, not the politicians and business leaders) unmistakably understand our collective human intention to be good. How do you do that? It’s simple. I'm paraphrasing what the author has to tell us, as he knows a great deal more about AI than I do - having worked for Google and watched an army of gripping robots learning from one another how to lift children's toys. Direct quotes are in quotes. The growth on the next chip in your phone is going to be a million times more than the computer that put people on the moon.”He joined Google in 2007, [7] and eventually rose to the position of chief business officer at Google X. [8]
Mo Gawdat Audiobook Guides | Mo Gawdat
The answer to how we can prepare the machines for this ethically complex world resides in the way we raise our own children and prepare them to face our complex world’ Including regulating our environment and economy and everything else computers currently do, and a whole lot more that we simply can’t predict, because we won’t be the ones inventing it or even making it anymore. Very few of the stories that we read about forms of intelligence that are artificial if you like, forms of robots have always had that dark side to them. And yet we continue to be fascinated about them and we continue to try and create them. I always refer to War of the Worlds, if you remember how famous that story is and in it, I think it starts with who would have believed that at the turn of the 20th century, that a being far more intelligent than us is coming to planet Earth. Interestingly, when you read that story, you think that it is an intelligence that’s coming from outer space, but it would apply equally if it was any intelligence that was created right here.
Follow E+T magazine
Another highlight for me was his unique take on how our actions today – both individually and collectively – can influence the AI of tomorrow. It’s a compelling perspective that emphasizes our agency and responsibility in this rapidly advancing digital age. Instead of painting a picture where AI is something done to us, he suggests it's something we can shape and mold, at least to a certain degree. This concept, which he discusses in various chapters, adds a hopeful undertone to the narrative. Children don't learn from what you say. They learn from what you do." AIs are already reading and learning from what we say and choose and do online. And what we support. Every year we create more information than we created in human history to date. So "the store of collective human knowledge is diluted by 50% each year" and altered in tone by the new data.
Mo Gawdat on the unstoppable growth of artificial Mo Gawdat on the unstoppable growth of artificial
When we ask computers to communicate, at first they communicate like we tell them, but if they're intelligent enough, they'll start to say, ‘that's too slow.’” I do not know if it’s because he’s a slave to the conversational style he used to create this (narrating rather than writing the book) which changes the feel utterly, and it does have shades of reading a transcript at times. The other question I get on the topic is that how does the presence of AI contradict the concept of God for those who believe in God? I think the parameters continue to remain the same. So, the reality is that AI was created within a world that is created, or within a world that existed. So, the rules that created that world in which you’ve created, worlds will basically be subjected to the same assumptions. So, could AI be like a God? Yes. If you believe there is a God, then that God still exists on top of AI, if you don’t, then you’ve never had that argument anyway. And I think that’s an interesting philosophical contemplation to go through.All those moral questions of virtual vice. There is so much AI being developed for porn and sex robots and so on. What are we telling those machines? Are we telling them it’s OK for a human to abuse a machine but not abuse another human? Why is the differentiation? You know, if we as capitalism will drive us, will probably find some sex robots and robots that are available for humans to abuse and beat, what are we telling them? The question of ethics becomes so deeply the cornerstone of this conversation. And the bigger problem with ethics, and I think you would agree, is that we humans have never agreed any. Or, it could be that this text was actually written (developed? Spawned?) by an AI bot which is why it was so sparsely referenced, simply circular and most annoyingly…
Great Deal 
New Comment