Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
a b Bruce Beveridge and Steve Hall (2004). Olympic & Titanic: The Truth Behind the Conspiracy. Infinity Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7414-1949-1. An expert has given three possible explanations as to what happened to the submarine-like vessel that vanished in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. Shetty, M. R. (1 February 2003). "Cause of death among passengers on the Titanic". The Lancet. 361 (9355): 438. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12423-3. ISSN 0140-6736. PMID 12573421. S2CID 45973512. Personnel who had loaded the practice torpedoes the day before the exercise noticed that the rubber seals were leaking fuel and notified junior officers of the issue, but they took no action because the exercise was so important to the Russian Navy. [6] Though the leaks on the dummy torpedoes had been detected, the rubber seals were not inspected before the exercise. [20] :35 The crew was also supposed to follow a very strict procedure while preparing the practice HTP torpedo for firing. [79] And, of course, Johnson once again had to get in the mix—this time claiming it was part of a “ psy-op,” which has increasingly become part of the right-wing media’s lexicon since “Chief Twit” Elon Musk began using the term to complain about stories he doesn’t like.
Titanic conspiracy theories - Wikipedia
Yes, many red flags!” he added in another reply. “That’s why both the TV story and the “Unsung Science“ podcast episode spent so much time challenging the CEO about the safety and construction of the submersible.” On 26 July 2002, almost two years later, the government commission and Russian Prosecutor General Vladimir Ustinov announced that the hydrogen peroxide fuel in the dummy torpedo inside the fourth torpedo launcher set off the initial explosion that sank Kursk. [13] Secret report [ edit ] He said: “The only hope I think one has is that the mother ship will have a stand-by craft that can actually go down and investigate immediately. Communications professor Yotam Ophir told Insider that people have always been deeply interested in rescue missions. The hopelessly flawed rescue attempt, hampered by badly designed and decrepit equipment, illustrated the fatal decline of Russia's military power. The navy's callous approach to the families of the missing men was reminiscent of an earlier Soviet insensitivity to individual misery. The lies and incompetent cover-up attempts launched by both the navy and the government were resurrected from a pre- Glasnost era. The wildly contradictory conspiracy theories about what caused the catastrophe said more about a naval high command in turmoil, fumbling for a scapegoat, than about the accident itself. [55] Conspiracy theories [ edit ]
Communication malfunction
On April 14, 1912, the Titanic collided with an iceberg, damaging the hull's plates below the waterline on the starboard side, causing the front compartments to flood. The ship then sank two hours and forty minutes later, with approximately 1,496 fatalities as a result of drowning or hypothermia. [1] Since then, many conspiracy theories have been suggested regarding the disaster. These theories have been refuted by subject-matter experts. Unsurprisingly, these kinds of unhinged and exhaustively disproven theories have turned into a major headache for those who have studied the sunken passenger ship for decades. Right-wing pundits, however, focused their attention on another factor they felt was responsible for the sub disaster: Wokeness.
Conspiracy Lunatics Think the Titanic Never Actually Sank Conspiracy Lunatics Think the Titanic Never Actually Sank
In an emergency, personnel in the rear compartments were to move forward to the third compartment along with those in the forward compartments and enter a detachable rescue capsule in the sail (or conning tower), which was capable of evacuating the entire crew. [80] Alternatively, there was also an escape trunk in the first compartment, but the explosion and fire rendered use of it impossible. [11] [34] [81] The rescue capsule in the third compartment was inaccessible, even if it was still usable. [14] Shutdown of nuclear reactors [ edit ] The whole scene was captured by the TV crew, but it was not televised within Russia. Foreign media showed Tylik being removed by officials from the meeting. [20] :36 [65] Tylik later criticised President Putin because he "did not answer direct questions" at the meeting. "Maybe he did not know what to say, but we did not receive concrete answers to concrete questions," she said. [63] [66] Tylik told The St. Petersburg Times that she would go to any lengths to learn the truth about the submarine disaster: "They told us lies the whole time, and even now we are unable to get any information," she said. [63] Since conservative media has been obsessed with raging against all things “ woke”—now redefined as a catch-all pejorative centered on diversity and race—the Post’s Wednesday story was like catnip for right-wing infotainers. People seem to love a good insurance fraud story, so maybe it’s unsurprising that this conspiracy theory is one of the Titanic’s most popular. This one posits that someone switched the Titanic with another White Star Line ship, the R.M.S. Olympic. But as Paul Burns, vice president and curator for the Titanic Museum Attractions in Missouri and Tennessee, points out, “it just doesn’t make any sense.” In response to the avalanche of criticism, Minister of Defence Sergeyev and senior commanders of the Navy and the Northern Fleet offered Putin their resignations, but he refused to accept them. [6] :160On 1 December 2001, Prosecutor General Vladimir Ustinov presented a preliminary report to Putin. Ustinov wrote that the entire exercise had been "poorly organized" and that the probe had revealed "serious violations by both Northern Fleet chiefs and the Kursk crew." [109] Shortly afterward, Putin transferred the Northern Fleet commander, Vyacheslav Popov, and his chief of staff, Admiral Mikhail Motsak. [58] As is common in such circumstances, both soon obtained jobs elsewhere in the government. Popov became a representative for the Murmansk region in the Federation Council, and Motsak became deputy presidential envoy for the North-Western Federal District. [70] Popov and Motsak had championed the story that the accident had been caused by a collision with a NATO submarine. When Putin dismissed them, he made a point of repudiating the collision theory. [6] :163 In another example of a lateral transfer, Deputy Prime Minister Ilya Klebanov had been an outspoken advocate of the theory that the Kursk had collided with a foreign submarine. He had also been in charge of the rescue operation and follow-up inquiry. In February 2002, Putin removed him from his position as Deputy prime minister and made him minister of industry, science, and technology. [109]
submarine Three theories on how missing Titanic wreck submarine
Several right-wing commentators have accused Joe Biden of withholding news of the Titan submersible's demise to distract from recent developments with his son, Hunter, after it was revealed the U.S. Navy likely detected the vessel's implosion on Sunday. On Monday 14 August, Fleet Admiral Vladimir Kuroyedov stated the accident had been caused by a serious collision with a NATO submarine, [30] although he gave no evidence to support his statement. [20] Senior commanders of the Russian Navy repeated this account for more than two years after the disaster. Many who wished for continued poor relations between Russia and the West supported this scenario. [20] Nope. The late Titanic historian Walter Lord wrote that he received letters from people in Ireland relaying this “NO POPE” story beginning in the mid-1950s. Yet as Burns pointed out in his 1986 book, The Night Lives On, there was no such number attached to the Titanic.
The divers tried to use the arms of the ROV to open the hatch, but were unsuccessful until the morning of Monday, 21 August; they found the rescue trunk full of water. [15] [16] That morning, they used a custom tool to open the internal hatch of the rescue trunk, releasing a large volume of air from the ninth compartment. Divers lowered a video camera on a rod into the compartment and could see several bodies. [16]
How Right-Wing Media Made the Titan Sub Disaster a Vast
Prior to news of the implosion making headlines, Nicholas Passalacqua, the director of forensic anthropology at Western Carolina University shared his own theory as to what would happen to the passengers if they died. In an interview with Insider, he claimed that the bodies of the five passengers can oddly be preserved inside the submarine. He said: “Generally in an environment without oxygen, remains will not decompose much because the micro and macro organisms that would work to consume and decompose the tissues will be unable to survive.” Speaking to Sky News, Former Rear Admiral Chris Parry described the timeline of the missing submarine as very concerning and outlined five possible reasons for its disappearance. If there was a power or communications failure, the Guardian reports that the Titan would be equipped with drop weights, which can be released in an emergency, creating enough buoyancy to take it to the surface. Catastrophic failure In a press conference on Thursday, Mauger said that it had been a "complex" case in a remote part of the ocean, adding: "I know there are also a lot of questions about how, why, and when did this happen. Those are questions we will collect as much information as we can about now."
They’re stuck inside the Titanic shipwreck
Senan Molony has suggested that attempts to extinguish the fire – by shoveling burning coals into the engine furnaces – may have been the primary reason for the Titanic steaming at full speed prior to the collision, despite ice warnings. [30] Most experts disagree. Samuel Halpern has concluded that "the bunker fire would not have weakened the watertight bulkhead sufficiently to cause it to collapse." [31] [32] Also, it has been alternatively suggested that the coal bunker fire actually helped Titanic to last longer during the sinking and prevented the ship from rolling over to starboard after the impact, due to the subtle port list created by the moving of coal inside the ship prior to the encounter with the iceberg. [33] Some of these foremost Titanic experts have published a detailed rebuttal of Molony's claims. [34] See also [ edit ] It’s a very difficult operation. The actual nature of the sea bed is very undulating. The Titanic herself lies in a trench. While the official government commission blamed the explosion on a faulty weld in the practice torpedo, Vice Admiral Valery Ryazantsev cited inadequate training, poor maintenance, and incomplete inspections that caused the crew to mishandle the weapon. [19] The internal tube door was designed to be three times as strong as the external torpedo door, so that any explosion inside the tube would be directed out into the sea. [71] Salvage crews found the internal tube hatch cover embedded in the bulkhead separating the first and second compartments, 12m (39ft) from the tube. This led investigators to conclude that the internal door likely was not fully closed when the explosion occurred. [71] Essentially, until more evidence emerges – the answers are unclear. Related stories recommended by this writer:
Great Deal 
New Comment