Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1 TB PCIe NVMe M.2 Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) (MMZ-V7S1T0BW )

Product Information

We can't rule out the possibility of a '970 PRO Plus' sometime this year, but it seems far more likely that we won't see another PRO NVMe drive until 2020 with a new controller that may also bring PCIe 4.0 support. Until then, the 970 EVO Plus takes over the performance flagship position for Samsung's retail/consumer product line and the 970 PRO is only relevant for workloads that involve sustained writes of hundreds of GB per day. For workloads that merely consist of tens of GB per day or include some disk idle time for the SLC cache to recover, the 970 EVO Plus is now likely to offer both better performance and better pricing than the 970 PRO. The drives were running longer in the higher range of "Normal" to "High" during normal usage. Even though my daily work does not involve heavy write activity to the drives, working on a remote server was causing a lot of writes to the drives. I decided to install copper heatsinks on the drives to try and keep the temperatures in the "Normal" range. Interface : NVMe (PCIe Gen 3.0 x 4). Form Factor : M.2 (2280);Average Power Consumption (system level): Average: 6 W * Maximum: 9 W (Burst mode) * Actual power consumption may vary depending on system hardware & configuration. Power consumption (Idle) :Max. 30 mW * Actual power consumption may vary depending on system hardware & configuration Compared to the original 970 EVO, the 970 EVO Plus improves performance at every capacity and on every metric, but unevenly: the biggest gains are to write speeds, especially sequential writes. The 1TB model is now rated for 3.3GB/s writes to SLC cache compared to 2.5GB/s, and 1.75GB/s after the cache is full compared to 1.25GB/s. Random read speeds are about 20% better, and sequential reads see the smallest benefit with an increase from 3.4GB/s to 3.5GB/s; the PCIe 3.0 x4 interface is preventing anyone from doing much better than that. The later launch date of the 2TB 970 EVO Plus suggests that the only 9xL NAND Samsung is ready to release to the retail market is their 256Gb TLC; the 512Gb TLC and QLC parts are probably still in the sampling phase for either the memory itself, or the OEM or datacenter drives are still sampling rather than in full production. If Samsung plans a regular MLC part at 92 layers, it's almost certainly the lowest priority to move off 64L, after they get both TLC parts and both QLC parts out the door.

T>80C - Se non state sforzando il disco a livelli estremi o se non state lavorando di fianco a un vulcano in eruzione, c'è qualcosa che non va Capacities up to 1TB will be available from today, with the 2TB model launching in April. Pricingfor that part has not yet been announced, however it is likely to be at a similar price density per GB as the 1TB. Transitioning to 92-Layer (9xL)NAND The results after installing the heatsink were astounding. (See photo). After this experience, I would recommend using a heatsink with these drives for anyone who intends to make full use of the capabilities of this drive. I used a cloning software (not the one Samsung provides) to clone my System drive to one of the 970. Then I booted up the system from the 970 after removing the old SSD. The boot time reduced from about 7-10 seconds (from the Dell logo to Windows login screen) to about 3-5 seconds. This was just a taster of things to come.

Out of Bundle Charges

En cuanto temperatura y dado que un M.2. suele calentarse más que un SSD normal le he puesto un disipador. El máximo al que ha llegado hasta el momento es de 44º C que suele ser lo normal cuando estás trabajando. Samsung's 9xL 3D NAND process doesn't provide huge density increases to further drive costs down, but it does provide numerous performance and power efficiency improvements that make it a good way for Samsung to improve a high-end product like the 970 EVO. The new generation of 3D NAND upgrades the interface between the controller and NAND to Toggle-mode DDR 4.0, increasing the interface speed from 800Mbps to 1400Mbps while reducing the voltage from 1.8V to 1.2V. This gives Samsung the lead for another generation, as 96L NAND from Intel, Micron and SK Hynix will only support up to a 1200Mbps interface, and Toshiba/SanDisk 96L NAND is only at 800Mbps.

Es extraordinariamente rápido en todos los valores. Adjunto benchmarks en texto del Samsung 970 evo plus 1TB, del WD SN750 500GB y de un Samsung 960 EVO por comparar. that violates any law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including, but not limited to, those governing export control, consumer protection, unfair competition, anti-discrimination or false advertising); Design flexibility The next advancement in NVMe SSD. The 970 EVO Plus fits up to 2TB onto the compact M.2 (2280) form factor, greatly expanding storage capacity and saving space for other components. Samsung's innovative technology empowers you with the capacity to do more and accomplish more. Samsung's offerings for the 970 EVO Plus will range from 250GB to 2TB. Samsung 970 EVO Plus Retail Units

Samsung 970 EVO Plus MZ-V7S1T0BW - Pros & Cons

A pesar de que en algunos medios en internet se indica que el 970 EVO Plus es igual al 970 EVO realmente esto no es así. Indagando más en profundidad el EVO Plus usa una tecnología de memoria de 96 capas (96-layer) en lugar de las 64 capas (64-layer) que usa en 970 EVO. Además tiene un nuevo firmware optimizado. Con todo ellos tenemos un modelo muy rápido que como veis en los números ya casi está topando con el límite teórico de PCIe 3.0 4x (3940MB/s) aunque va está PCIe 4.0 a la vuelta de la esquina con los Ryzen.

Sequential Read up to 3,500 and Write speeds up to 3,300 MB/s respectively. Performance varies based on system hardware and configuration;SSD Capacity: 1TB, Cache: Samsung 1GB Low Power DDR4 SDRAM Always evolving SSD The ultimate in performance, upgraded. Faster than the 970 EVO, the 970 EVO Plus is powered by the latest V-NAND technology and firmware optimization. It maximizes the potential of NVMe bandwidth for unbeatable computing. La durabilidad según fabricante en ambos modelos es la misma 300 TBW para los modelos de 500GB y 600 para los de 1TB. Esto equivale aproximadamente a una durabilidad de 5 años escribiendo una media de 164GB diarios, o dicho de otra forma, 10 años escribiendo 82GB diarios. Un plato es un plato y un vaso es un vaso pero es una cifra que en términos absolutos no es muy alta pero para el usuario medio es más que suficiente. use of the content you supply does not violate these Terms of Use and will not cause injury to any person or entity.

FOLLOW

Strange! It may also be that the made in Korea drive gets written to more often as it is my System Drive. But it's not a convincing enough reason for me. For the review today, we are testing the 250GB and 1TB versions of the Samsung 970 EVO Plus. AnandTech 2018 Consumer SSD Testbed

In combination with the latest Samsung V-NAND technology and firmware optimization, the 970 EVO Plus achieves random write speeds up to 57% faster than the 970 EVO. Also, it offers industry-leading sequential performance among NVMe SSDs with read/write speeds of up to 3,500/3,300 MB/s, respectively. The 970 EVO Plus performance will be the industry-leading and maximum within the current PCIe Gen3 interface. A 970 EVO Plus eszköz akár 3500/3300 MB/s-os folyamatos olvasási/írási sebességre képes, és így akár 53-szor gyorsabb a 970 EVO meghajtónál. A legújabb V-NAND – amely fokozza a NAND-teljesítményt, és még inkább energiatakarékos –, valamint az optimalizált firmware, a bizonyított tudású Phoenix vezérlő és az Intelligent TurboWrite megnöveli. Pertanto, io non mi preoccuperei molto della temperatura, non è necessario utilizzare un dissipatore per questo disco, ma se la vostra scheda madre ha il dissipatore integrato ben venga. Non è necessario togliere le etichette dal disco, mi risulta siano termoconduttive quindi potrete appiccicare eventuali dissipatori direttamente sopra il disco senza togliere le etichette. TRIM support, Auto Garbage Collection Algorithm, Dynamic Thermal Guard protection, TurboWrite Technology, V-NAND Technology, NVM Express (NVMe) 1.3, Samsung Phoenix Controller, S.M.A.R.T. Tuve que cambiar un viejo SSD de 250 GB que estaba instalado a los solos efectos del SO Al empezar a quedarse corto a pesar de estar continuamente liberando espacio (es una cosa increíble como con el paso del tiempo el SO, en este caso Windows, acaba de extenderse) decidí comprar un 970 EVO Plus de un 1TB y con conexión M.2 en una placa Asus H97M-Plus. He cambiado las conexiones de los restantes discos duros para que el M.2 tenga vía libre sin tener que compartir con nadie su puerto (en mi placa el M.2. comparte con los SATA5/6). Funciona perfectamente si bien no alcanza las velocidades que debería. Según algunos comentarios se puede deber a que se trate de la fabricación china (en mi caso pone Made in Thailand). Sea como sea, los "Up to 3500 MB/s" que dice Samsung en la caja no los pilla ni de cerca. Llega a unos 815-817 MB/s. Tal vez sea la placa o cualquier otra cosa. No me he puesto a indagar. A mí me vale pero habrá otros que se queden cortos.

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB M.2 SSD

Aún teniendo en cuenta que las versiones de 1TB suelen ser más rápidas siempre que sus contrapartidas de 500GB me gusta más el Samsung.