The Starchild Skull -- Genetic Enigma or Human-Alien Hybrid?

Product Information

Trace Genetics –In 2003, Trace Genetics, a lab that specializes in extracting ancient DNA concludes the Starchild Skull and the companion skull are not related as each belong to a different haplogroup. The Starchild’s mitochondrial DNA (inherited exclusively from the mother) has origins in haplogroup C. The companion skull has origins in haplogroup A and is female. Both haplogroups are Native American. In addition to the external occipital protuberance on the outside of the skull, there is an "internal occipital protuberance” on the inside. This functions like a shelf holding some of the weight of the brain. While the Starchild does have this internal shelf, it is much smaller than it would be in a normal human. I have to say I am really impressed and have a lot of respect for the owner, Melanie Young to do the hard thing and change the direction and motives of the investigation when it became obvious that it was being done for other motives,

a b Novella, Steven (20 July 2009). "The Starchild Project". The New England Skeptical Society . Retrieved March 17, 2011. a b Brian Regal (15 October 2009). Pseudoscience: A Critical Encyclopedia: A Critical Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. pp.88–. ISBN 978-0-313-35508-0. Normal skull bone feature lacunae are absent from the Starchild Skull bone. Lacunae are tiny holes in the bone that offer new cell delivery. The SEM test from Selee Labs shows that these are present in the interior part of the bone. The absence of this structure on the exterior part of the bone can be explained by the cleaning, polishing and coats of lacquer that were applied to the skull. The liquid lacquer filled in the tiny holes on the surface.Smith, B. et. al. "An anatomical study of a duplication 6p based on two sibs." American Journal of Medical Genetics. 3 Jun. 2005, Volume 20, Issue 4: 649-663. FOXP2, κάθεμίαπουεμφανίζεταιπαρουσιάζειεξουθενωτικέςήαπειλητικέςγιατηζωήσυνέπειες, επομένωςμέχριαυτήτηστιγμήκαμίαδενέχειμεταδοθείστονγενικόπληθυσμότωνανθρώπων.Αυτόσημαίνειότιστησυντριπτικήπλειοψηφίατωνανθρώπων, τοκύριογονίδιο FOXP2 είναιαπολύτωςπανομοιότυπο. Removed 2012 DNA post – http://web.archive.org/web/20131231054638/http://starchildproject.com/dna-testing/2010-nuclear-dna-report

At an Indian burial ground excavated in Michigan in 1890, three of the skulls recovered had three holes in the crown, and of these, two had double teeth in front. We also know that people living in the hollow world were worried after the atomic bombs exploded in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and sent UFOs, which were called "flugelrad", to the surface of the world for exploration and observation. As I mentioned earlier, Nordic aliens appeared in the 1950s, so the dates are pretty much the same. Medina County, Ohio, 1881. Nine skeletons found while digging the cellar of a house, all with double teeth. The skulls were so large one man was able to put one on like a hat, and it rested upon his shoulders. Skeletons were exhumed from a burial mound in Bradford County, Pennsylvania, in the 1880's. They were seven feet tall, but most extraordinarily, they had horns. Although modern replicas have been created and photographed based on the descriptions, the original horned skulls were sent to the American Investigating Museum in Philadelphia where they vanished before they could be documented. (Incidentally, the entire Internet has not a single reference to any institution called the "American Investigating Museum" outside of this one story.) Skulls with abnormal features have been discovered many times before this one and upon examination have proven to be the result of known medical conditions or cultural practices. Search the Web and you’ll find no shortage of sceptics claiming that, in life, the Starchild suffered one of these.

Join Our Free Newsletter

Castriota-Scanderbeg, A., Dallapiccola, B. Abnormal Skeletal Phenotypes. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005. 3-100, 501-931. Skeptic's Answer:It is a child of about 5 years old, and possibly had Progeria, which causes dental problems. Mason County, Virginia, 1821: Seven skulls found, so large they could easily fit over a man's head; with double rows of teeth on the upper jaw, and but two solitary teeth on the lower jaw. Problem with the Answer:It didn't have any of these conditions as proven by X-Rays and CT scans, andthe Starchild Skull is not a fossil. (Fossils are over 10,000 years old, the Starchild Skull is only 900 years old, reference the C14 dating report

A Starchild Skull replica was made by Joe Taylor at the Mt. Blanco Fossil Museum. A mold was made by carefully applying latex to the interior and exterior of the Skull and talcum was applied to the finished latex mold to assist removal . After curing, the mold was used to create an exact replica and identical coloring was applied. The human’s bone looks like alabaster, while the Starchild’s bone is milky due to its extraordinary levels of collagen, which is abundant in animal teeth.The Starchild Skull weighs half as much as a normal skull. The Starchild Skull weighs the same as all other 5-6-year-old skulls. The previous conclusions were in comparison with adult skulls. At the top of the rear of the Starchild’s head is a noticeable “crease” at the rear of its saggital suture, where it meets the lambdoidal suture. The only possible way this can happen in a human skull is if there is abnormal fusion of the saggital suture. A CAT Scan showed that no such abnormal fusion exists in the Starchild Skull.

Paleo Labs tests results were conclusive in their Y-DNA report; the Starchild was a male and his father was a human from haplogroup Q which is what comprises 94% of indigenous South Americans. While a tiny amount of survivable mutations are possible in FOXP2, every one that occurs presents debilitating or life-threatening consequences, so up to this point in time none have been passed on to the general population of humans. This means in the vast, vast majority of humans, the FOXP2 master gene is absolutely identical. The ears on the Starchild Skull are considerably lower and the “hearing region” is twice as big as a normal skull.The ear placement is lower than a normal child. There are many genetic reasons for this anomaly and this cannot be ignored. However, the genetic testing for disease is expensive and the certainty of reliable DNA results with disease markers from a 900-year-old skull are almost impossible at this time. The lower ear placement is not so uncommon that it would be a significant reason to believe it was not human. Even adding this anomalous claim combined with all of the other reported anomalies starts to define medical answers such as down syndrome. This comparison with a 6-year-old skull with down syndrome was completed at the Osteology Museum in Oklahoma City, OK. The abnormal features presented on both were so striking and similar that Down Syndrome could NOT be ignored as part or most of a reasonable or scientific explanation and must be further tested. All experts agree. Pye claimed the skull to be a hybrid offspring of an extraterrestrial and a human female. [3] [4] Assessment of the evidence [ edit ]

References & Further Reading

low placed ears – http://www.nytimes.com/health/guides/symptoms/pinna-abnormalities-and-low-set-ears/overview.html Increased head skull size – http://www.rightdiagnosis.com/symptoms/macrocephaly_in_children/causes.htm Prothero, Donald R.; Callahan, Timothy D. (2017). UFOs, Chemtrails, and Aliens: What Science Says. Indiana University Press. pp.113–. ISBN 978-0253027061. The last time I saw Lloyd was on 18 Sept 2013, when he showed me the Starchild Braincasts. At that time, he told me more about a new development with the Starchild project. Lloyd explained that some months previously, he had gone to see a business man, based in Tampa Florida, called Matthew Brownstein. Matthew was going to try and help Lloyd to develop skills for raising funds for the research into the Skull, as Lloyd felt he had not been very successful at this. Mr Brownstein himself became acutely interested in the skull and started to do his own research. At this time, Lloyd and others were attempting to raise further funds for ongoing DNA testing and analysis which, for the previous 3 years or so, had been undertaken on a voluntary basis by an anonymous geneticist in the USA. The geneticist had the permission of the company he was working for to do this research, but the company, too, wanted to remain anonymous at that time.